Quick question - do you think Indie authors need to be more prolific than others?

(27 Aug 2012 11:59 AM)AERichards Wrote:  My view is that if anything indie authors have to be less prolific than others. The general perception that 'non-indie must be better' means that quality is even more important than with a traditionally published book.

Abby

(27 Aug 2012 04:49 PM)LexiRevellian Wrote:  

(27 Aug 2012 11:59 AM)AERichards Wrote:  My view is that if anything indie authors have to be less prolific than others. The general perception that 'non-indie must be better' means that quality is even more important than with a traditionally published book.

Abby

A bit like in olden times when, if you were a woman, you had to be better than a man in the same job - and if you weren't, you failed for all women...